Kirsty O’Callaghan

Kirsty O’Callaghan has been back on Facebook for a while, I kept it to myself because I knew that if I wrote about it that she would go back under whatever rock she came out of.

You have to ignore any of the timestamps on the screenshots, some of them are many months old. I screenshot them and did nothing with them until now. Screenshots are taken on different devices, I usually get all my screenshots fresh when I write a post, so they show how long ago what i’m screenshotting was posted, that hasn’t happened here. Ive been collecting the screenshots but she has either deleted some of them, or made them friends only, so the screenshots may have been taken hours after she posted them but that was months ago now.

When she first came back to Facebook she had her friends first open so you could see who she was friends with, she has since closed that, but there was something interesting on there, this was very shortly after she set up her new Facebook so the first people she added must be the most important to her.

My blog is a safe space, it’s where I hope everyone feels safe enough to read my posts without fear of discrimination, including religious discrimination. I know that some of you reading this may be members of the Church of the People of Flood, I hope my post does not upset you in any way.

I’m talking about Flooded People UK, as we all know their social media is handled by Mr Simon Harris, but he isn’t the only admin/moderator on the Flooded People UK private group. See for yourself:

Now a view from my laptop:

Emmy? Kirsty? Simon? Where have we heard those three names together before? Oh yeah, here:

So with two of the three of the SocialKind posse working together, I wonder if there is any link to the third member of that particular 2022 supergroup? Oh wait, here is Emmy on Kirsty’s friends list:

I can’t help but wonder if the band is back together?

There has certainly been no indication on Kirsty’s Facebook that she is currently in employment, so either she has enough money saved to live a very good life on, or she is working in some capacity. If Simon is friends with Kirsty on Facebook I would be shocked if he used his main account, solely because of what people would think. If it was me I would make sure there was nothing online that could connect us so absence of any direct link doesn’t mean they aren’t working together in my opinion.

Is this SocialKind 2.0? We know Simon and Emmy are working together on Flooded People UK, it is at the very least possible, if not probable, that they have their fingers in other pies as well.

Here’s the proof it’s Kirsty’s Facebook, methinks she’s been at the skinny jabs, i’ve got no issues with that, it’s a solution to a problem.

Loving the song choice with those roots? Yes that was bitchy especially given we are of a similar age and my roots are white/grey. Top tip if your kids are young, when you need to dye your roots tell them that you’ve dyed them grey/white to see how it looks but you don’t like it so you are going to dye them back to your natural hair colour. My kids believed that one for many years.

Another proof type image, it appears someone smeared vaseline on the camera lens before this one was taken:

Now it’s time for some advice:

I hope Simon isn’t reading my blog, he’d explode (literally) at that photo. Loving the way that Kirsty is being all judgy at those who are using their voices. Though to be fair I am being quiet, this is the current time/date:

I’ve got three autistic adult children, and 2 of them were doing an autism so I put it on social media, oh wait, no, I didn’t, that would be cruel and unfair on my children. Anyway, i’m awake, clearly, otherwise I wouldn’t be typing this. Also a bit pissed that Simon Harris is sitting on all of that money, 30% of which did NOT come from ringfenced posts but came straight from the ECC budget, and I can’t get any help.

Kirsty O’Callaghan is not a fan of Tattle, I know this will surprise absolutely nobody but whatever, these won’t be in any order.

Tattle – vile criminal site, it’s official! Clearly she’s definitely not doing a defamation.

Last one..

Kirsty O’Callaghan does not like Tattle, given that she’s not been mentioned (much) on Tattle for 2 and a half years i’m wondering if she is posting those because she’s still friends with Simon. Who knows. Who cares.

So what has she been up to? She mentions nothing about employment on her Facebook page, but she has been keeping busy spending money.

Metallica concert

Yeah, so I can’t find most of them, will add them in when I do. I’ll fio that later

Here’s Kirsty with who I believe is her boyfriend:

Wine tour of Italy? Would love to be able to afford that.

I can only find out details that are public, so everything anyone can see if they knew where to look. So the answer to what Kirsty O’Callaghan has been doing is not a lot, spending the money she was paid from various employments.

she also posted this regarding stalking/harrassment.

Stalking and harrassment is a serious crime which isn’t taken seriously enough and unfortunately does sometimes end in death.

Giving your opinion on information that is in the public domain is not stalking and harrassment. I’ve sat in court during a harrasment case, first thing they do is find out whether the alleged harrassment falls under Article 10 of the ECHR and the UK human rights act. It’s a high bar.

Everything i write is covered under article 10.

Sebastian Bond will be very aware of his article 10 rights and that will be why the rules on Tattle are so stringent and strictly enforced. His legal team will have been all over that from the start. I’m not a legal expert but I assume that Tattle is likely bulletproof with regards to how they adhere to article 10.

That said, those who are mentioned on Tattle have their own article 10 rights and can say what they want to say against Tattle and those who post there as long as it’s within the law. You obviously can’t make things up or that comes under defamation. Anything threatening is, well it’s threats and tht is illegal. Tattle is almost exclusively about those who have chosen to put themselves on a public platform and that’s how they make their money. It’s influencers and other famous people, they make money by telling people absolutely everything they are doing and want the public to engage with them.

Wherever there are famous people there will be adoring fans and those who are vocal about their dislike for that famous person’s actions and/or views. This has been happening for centuries. The price of fame is having to deal with those who don’t like you.

There are extremes on both sides of fame, fans who adore you who end up stalking because they truly believe they are in love with the famous person and believe that feeling is mutual. Then you have those who have hatred for the person running through their veins, whether it’s from a perceived slight or a hatred of someone else’s views. Both scenarios have ended in deaths. mental illness is usually at play in those scenarios.

That isn’t what happens on Tattle. I’m not saying those from those two groups haven’t tried to post on Tattle, but they will have gotten shut down instantly and deleted/banned. It’s a vanilla forum, everything is within the rules. It’s mostly women talking smack about others, it breaks no laws and given the moderation, it never will.

That said, and because i’m almost always honest when I write, I don’t begrudge those who are talked about being pissed off about it. “There is no such thing as bad publicity”. That’s a load of rubbish, of course there is. If someone says something bad about you it’s going to hurt, you are going to want to stand up for yourself and you are going to be pissed and upset, it would be odd if you weren’t. Add in that with an influencer your image and brand is your income, that’s another level of pissed and upset. I’m not going to sit here and say that I wouldn’t be pissed off if someone said something about me that could affect my income, the money I use to care for my family. Every influencer has a right to be pissed off at any comment made about them on Tattle, they have a right to be pissed off at Sebastian Bond for creating the platform that the comment is on. All of those feelings are valid.

Influencers have every right to say whatever against Tattle and it’s members. These rights are protected under article 10. They also have every right to sue if someone defames them. Not if it’s a difference of opinion however, just if it is something that genuinely defames them.

There are 3 types of those who are well known/famous. Those who are born famous, those who seek out fame, and those who are thrust into fame by being part of a news story that makes them national or international news.

I wasn’t born famous, I do not and will never seek out fame, I hope I am never unlucky enough to be a part of a news story that makes me famous, or any news story at all. That said, I don’t think it’s an abhorrent thing to want to be famous and to seek to be famous. It’s a natural desire to want others to like us, and praise us. As a species we abhor hearing anything critical about ourselves. Those being written about have every right to be pissed off and angry at anything written about them. They are allowed to hit back at those doing the writing and be critical about them and the site their comments are hosted on.

Unfortunately article 10 rights trump personal feelings. I’ve had some bad things said about me because of my other blog, some very bad things. Stung like hell, a mix of based in truth and not true, but came under article 10 rights so I pulled up my big girl panties and got on with it.

I solely stick to reading the Simon Harris threads on Tattle and everything i’ve seen there comes under article 10 rights. If they didn’t i’d be writing about it. The police get inundated with so called stalking and harrassment internet reports that actually aren’t, they come under freedom of expression under article 10. This leaves them overwhelmed while trying to deal with actual stalking and harrassment cases.

This blog isn’t stalking and harrassment, everything i’ve discussed has been put out in public by Simon, i’m just then giving my opinion, as is allowed under my freedom of expression.

So to sum up, SocialKind 2.0 may be a thing, it may not, Kirsty has a Facebook page with nothing interesting on it. I think that’s it.